The Information website claims to receive information about the device of virtual reality, which is going to release Apple. Judging by the voiced data, the company plans to hit almost the most advanced high-tech on the market.
The characteristics are as follows:
More than 12 built -in cameras that track the movements of the hands and show the user a picture of the real world.
Apparently, Apple more counts on augmented reality, where software interfaces fit into a person’s environment.
Technology that reduces the computing load: In places of peripheral vision, the level of graphics will decrease.
As the Information writes, team Apple Now leaning towards releasing the device in 2022 and ask for it $ 3,000. All this coincides with information from Bloomberg, where they talked about the helmet in more detail.
They say, Apple prepares such an expensive VR device because it will help with the production of more affordable virtual reality points that will come out in a few years.
February 5, 2021 Fresh hotfix eliminates the vulnerability in Cyberpunk 2077 on PC
February 5, 2021 Remes Resident Evil, Devil May Cry 5 and other Capcom games in a fresh report about circulations
The best comments
But charging does not come in the kit :)? Or every year I will release a new "breakthrough" version?
Jokes jokes, but not a word about controllers in the news.
Who would doubt it all.
Two displays with 8K resolution, which exceed most of the TVs in quality.
And what relics will be needed to start something?
They say that Apple is preparing such an expensive VR device because it will help with the production of more affordable virtual reality points that will come out in a few years.
Or maybe they will not come www.casino-betti.co.uk/ out. How the chip will lie down.
For some reason, not a word about this in the news on SG, but the original mention that this device is not virtual, but mixed reality. That is, the imposition of virtual objects on the picture and geometry of the real world. Accordingly, if there are games there, then very primitive, as in Microsovtovsky Hololens.
8K displays here are needed for reading small text, clarity of all sorts of thin frames, badges and virtual panels. That is, it does not think as the generation of a virtual 3D scene in a resolution of 2x8k. The maximum of the trozky here is a geometric distortion of a virtual TV, which the user will stick to the wall of his real apartment so that when moving the user, an illusion is created that the display hangs on the wall.
A loan of 10 years is 10 years old and then with foam at the mouth to prove something about "you do not understand, this is the Apple".
Well, that is, you have a couple of clinical idiots in your familiar, it’s good that only a couple.
Well, I personally know a couple of people who will take a 10-year loan for this business for 10 years and then they will prove something about “you don’t understand, this is the Apple” with foam at the mouth.
I would not say. I’m not a fanbo, but since 2019 I have been using the Samsung flagship and an iPad of pro (big iPhone) and iPad I love the screen much better than the screen, better the camera, better design, both the device itself and the interface. And Ipad did not begin to lag in these almost 2 years, and my Samsung C10+ is already a sad sight, sometimes the feeling that you have in your hands with Xiaomi for 100 bucks, and the camera matrix is already an ass. I do not presume to say for iPhones, because I have an iPad, but as far as I can know from the experience of friends, they also work better than Androids.
Well, the rest who, in principle, shit on power and camera, I believe, choose iPhones for design.
It is strange who is the target audience? With such a display there are two cards of 3090, you must probably put. It took a lot of money to develop such a device, it is not clear how they plan to beat them off. And APL, no matter how rich they are, are still not so patrons who are ready to play huge funds that will not pay off.
Well, of course, everyone will have $ 3,000 on a helmet and another $ 2,000 from above on a game PC
Something tells me that if you found $ 3,000 on a helmet, then at least you have for money, and you will find as much as you need on a PC. Of course, I understand that if the collective farmers who buy a new iPhone every year on credit, trying to seem to those who they are not, but we will not consider them. In the context of the games, if you gave $ 3,000 for a helmet, then you are clearly not a build not on Ryzen 5 1600 + RX 588, the total $ 700 is worth a total) the leg is bought for the screen 🙂 So the controller will be bought separately with charging 🙂
The original mention that this device is not virtual, but mixed reality
It seemed to me that this thought suggests itself from the mention of the picture of the outside world through the cameras. I was mistaken, now I will turn the thought.
Something tells me that if you found $ 3,000 on a helmet, then at least you have for money, and you will find as much as you need on a PC.
Not a fact, you know. Иногда ради этих 3000$ ты пашешь без продыху год, два или три. And when you collected a PC of Dreams, you understand with horror that for the next 3,000 $ you will have to plow again without a long time, two and three. Not everything is as obvious as it seems at first glance.
Yes, they have been engaged in phones all their lives. Previously, they were generally called Apple Phones Inc. But then they changed their name in 2007 to Apple Inc. To show that now they are also engaged in the creation of lousy laptops with bad screens, from shitty materials, fat, as dick knows that, and even all professional designers and developers simply laugh at their computers and never use them. And how are the viruses stick to macbooks is generally horror! Now, and the mobile iron switched to iron, so macbooks began to wildly wildly launched compared to Intel.
In general, yes, a failure project.
As a person who updated the dream system system last year (almost), having accumulated two years on him and still borrowed – I confirm.
Although it may be more reasonably accumulating, without unforeseen, almost force majeure, expenses-the easier.
Xs my Androids also didn’t start to lag in a couple of years.
Everything is known in comparison
Worse, while not so much technically as in calibration. The colors of not even top androids with expensive matrices look very worse than on iPhones. I say as a person who works daily with flowers on 4 different displays.
The price at high opportunities is at times lower
Well, this is not true. Android flagships are now almost as much as top iPhones. They just get cheaper faster, losing 40% of the cost per year, unlike an iPhone that loses 10%. Therefore, if you regularly update, selling last year’s device, then the iPhone will be even more profitable.
There is a way that there is a question about whether you are ready to, in principle, spend a thousand bucks on your phone or not. I’m not ready (I bought my C10+ for 1 hryvnia). IPhones are produced for those who are ready.
Even the most powerful PC with RTX 3090, cannot run RDR2 in 8k on ultras. The game gives only 5-8 fps. And this is RDR2, I’m already silent what will happen in some cyberpan.
You are not enough for you their ruler?
Just from the whole apple assortment, I don’t use phones.
That is, something like Google?
Yeah. The maximum pumped google ocher.
It’s just that you don’t have to rush with statements “once there were money for *this *, then there will be some other *”. How do these people know how to and how long I get the money?
